All SAP ABAP Entries Covered

For All Entries In Sap Abap

ABAP FOR ALL ENTRIES can be useful, but it is important to use it correctly to avoid data inconsistencies.


To utilize , you can construct a SELECT query by incorporating the FOR ALL ENTRIES clause and specifying one or more table fields in the WHERE condition.

IF t_ids IS NOT INITIAL. SELECT * INTO TABLE t_t100_all FROM t100 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_ids WHERE arbgb LIKE ‘0%’ AND msgnr = t_ids – table_line.

In cases where a table has only a few key fields, it is common for users to include them in their selection even if they are not necessary. However, when the number of fields increases, users often choose not to include them in both the table and the SELECT query.

Retrieve the values of ryear, drcrk, rpmax, rtcur, racct, rbukrs, rcntr, kokrs and hsl01 to hsl12 from the table faglflext and store them in the internal table lt_fagl. This should be done for all entries in the internal table lt_skb1 where ryear is included in lr_gjahr and racct matches with lt_skb1-saknr and rbukrs matches with lt_skb1-bukrs.

If the query does not include all the necessary key fields, you may encounter difficulties when trying to reconcile it with the standard transaction FAGLB03. This problem arises when there are multiple postings for the same general ledger account using the same cost center in different periods. In such cases, instead of retrieving all the entries, the system will only display one entry. Conversely, using the standard transaction will provide all entries and a different total amount.

When you are debugging a standard transaction in SAP ABAP and reach the SELECT statement, you might assume that your query is identical to the one being executed. However, when comparing the downloaded data from both your program and the standard transaction, you may notice that some entries are missing. After performing several rounds of VLOOKUP and comparison in Excel, it becomes apparent that the FOR ALL ENTRIES statement is dropping certain entries. This realization often occurs after becoming proficient in using Excel for analysis purposes.

You might be interested:  A Step-by-Step Guide to Debugging Outbound IDoc in SAP

To resolve this issue, you would then understand the need to add additional key fields in the SELECT statement. The next challenge would be to communicate to your Functional counterpart and users why it did not work as expected.

If this program was not developed by you, I can imagine how much you hate that person when you realized the root cause. A silly mistake! On bright side, you are now Excel expert 🙂

The Importance of Key Fields in SAP ABAP

To improve the performance, you would definitely want to have. If you don’t pass unique values, DB would reselect the records for each duplicate values. Finally, DB would remove the duplicates and give you the result set.

This removing of duplicate would create data inconsistencies, if you don’t have key fields in your selection fields part of your SELECT query. If you assume that all your fields would make up the unique value without including the Key fields, you are inviting trouble in the future.

Including the key fields of a table will guarantee that all the chosen entries are distinct. In case the SELECT operation involves multiple tables, it is essential to incorporate all the key fields from each of these tables.


Define a structure called “ty_t100” with three fields: “arbgb” of type “t100-arbgb”, “msgnr” of type “t100-msgnr”, and “text” of type “t100-text”.

IF t_ids IS NOT INITIAL. SELECT arbgb msgnr text “comment to see more records are dropping INTO TABLE t_t100 FROM t100 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_ids WHERE arbgb LIKE ‘0%’ AND msgnr = t_ids – table_line. WRITE : / ‘Without All Key Fields’ , sy – dbcnt.

IF t_ids IS NOT INITIAL. SELECT * INTO TABLE t_t100_all FROM t100 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_ids WHERE arbgb LIKE ‘0%’ AND msgnr = t_ids – table_line. WRITE : / ‘With ALL Key Fields’ , sy – dbcnt.

If you remove the TEXT field from the first query, you will notice that a larger number of records are being excluded. This occurs because the database only keeps distinct records and compares each record with all others before excluding duplicate rows. It is similar to using DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM itab COMPARING ALL FIELDS.

You might be interested:  Activating Objects in SAP: A Guide


To ensure data consistency, it is important to include all key fields in the internal table and select them when using FOR ALL ENTRIES in conjunction with other elements.

ABAP FOR ALL ENTRIES – The Importance of Including KEY Fields | ABAP Assistance. Restate this information using different words without elaborating on the subject, providing only original text. Write in Indian English.

ABAP FOR ALL ENTRIES – The Significance of Incorporating KEY Fields | ABAP Support.

Distinguishing between for all entries and joins

INNER JOINs in SAP ABAP are used to combine data from two or more tables based on a common field. When using INNER JOIN, the resulting dataset will only include records that satisfy the conditions specified in the WHERE clause. This means that only the intersection of the results from all tables involved will be returned.

On the other hand, FOR ALL ENTRIES is a statement in SAP ABAP that helps eliminate duplicate entries from query results. It allows you to specify a table as input and retrieves only those records where there is a match between fields in this table and fields in other tables being queried. By doing so, it ensures that each record appears only once in the final result set.

The maximum capacity of SAP ABAP for all records

– There is no limit on the number of entries.

– Exercise caution when using FOR ALL ENTRIES.

– Check for existing entries in the internal table before executing.

– Failure to do so may result in retrieving all data from the database table.

Using inner join and for all entries in SAP: A guide

Inner Join is a method used in SAP ABAP to combine two database tables that have common fields. By using this technique, you can retrieve data from both tables based on the matching values in those common fields. This allows for more comprehensive and accurate data retrieval.

When utilizing Inner Join, it is essential to identify the relevant fields that are shared between the two tables. These shared fields act as a bridge connecting the records from each table, allowing for effective data integration and analysis.

You might be interested:  Remote job opportunities for SAP Basis professionals

In contrast, For All Entries focuses on fetching data solely from one database table (Db1). The retrieved information is then stored within an internal table (itab1), which serves as a temporary storage location for further processing or analysis.

The purpose of all entries

– For all entries allows you to avoid multiple database accesses by using the data available in an internal table.

– It improves performance and reduces processing time by minimizing database calls.

– This feature is particularly useful when dealing with large datasets or complex queries.

– The syntax for using for all entries involves specifying the target table and conditions based on which additional data needs to be retrieved.

– You can combine multiple conditions using logical operators such as AND, OR, NOT, etc., within the for all entries statement.

– It is important to ensure that the internal table used with for all entries contains valid and up-to-date data before executing the query.

By leveraging the power of for all entries, developers can optimize their ABAP programs and enhance overall system efficiency.

What are the drawbacks of using SAP for all entries?

1. The FOR ALL ENTRIES clause helps fetch desired data from a table based on matching values stored in an internal table.

2. Duplicate rows are automatically eliminated when using this clause.

Inner Join vs. For All Entries in SAP: Which is Superior?

INNER JOIN is commonly used in SAP ABAP as it allows for efficient data retrieval by combining related records from multiple tables based on matching key fields. This type of join operation ensures accurate and reliable results while maintaining good performance.

On the other hand, FOR ALL ENTRIES (FAE) comes into play when dealing with specific situations such as cluster or pool tables. Cluster tables store large amounts of data in a compressed format, making direct access difficult. In such cases, FAE can be utilized to retrieve relevant information efficiently.

Additionally, if all possible optimizations have been attempted and performance problems persist, FAE can be considered as an alternative solution. However, it should not be assumed that FAE will always outperform INNER JOIN in terms of efficiency.